Why the advice differs by profession
The structural rules of a good CV are close to universal: reverse chronological, specific verbs, a number wherever one exists, nothing decorative that a parser can lose. What is not universal is which facts belong in the first fifteen seconds, and that changes completely from one field to the next.
An accountant is filtered on qualification stage before anyone reads a sentence, so it goes in the header. A nurse is filtered on registration and acuity, because the reader is mentally building next month’s rota. A software engineer’s skills block belongs above the job history; a sales manager’s quota record belongs above everything. Put the same four sections in the same order for all four of them and three of the four CVs are answering the wrong question first.
The metrics diverge just as sharply. Quota attainment, working days to close, cohort progress against a departmental average, p99 latency, retail doors, staffing ratio — a number only persuades when the reader recognises it as the right kind of number. Each guide below names the two to four that count in that field, and shows three real bullets being rewritten to use them.
What each guide contains
- The order a hiring manager in that field reads your CV in.
- The metrics that carry weight, and what a credible version of each looks like.
- Recommended section order — and the sections to leave off.
- Three weak bullets rewritten, with a note on exactly what changed.
- The keyword families a parser in that job family is likely matching for.
- Mistakes specific to the profession, and two to four templates that suit it.
- A short note on what changes for a US résumé, for the same role.