How much this matters depends entirely on where you are applying. Independent studios and agencies mostly review portfolios by hand, and a parser may never touch your file. Large in-house teams — retailers, banks, universities, public sector, big consumer brands — run design applications through the same systems as everything else, and creative CVs are the ones most likely to fail there because of how they are built.
The practical compromise is to keep one plain single-column version for portal applications and a more considered one for direct approaches. In the plain version, make sure the discipline words appear in text rather than only in a graphic, because a heavily designed header often contributes nothing a parser can read.
How applicant tracking systems read a CV covers the mechanics in more detail, and the ATS-friendly templates are the layouts least likely to lose any of this.
Terms in this job family- Disciplines
- brand identitypackaging designeditorial designart directionmotion graphicsUI design
- Software
- Adobe InDesignIllustratorPhotoshopAfter EffectsFigmaAdobe Creative Cloud
- Production
- prepressartworkcolour managementCMYKprint specificationretouchingtypesetting
- Ways of working
- brand guidelinesdesign systemclient presentationstudio managementconcept development
Nothing here guarantees a shortlisting, and in this field the portfolio outweighs the file format by a wide margin. The point is simply that a portal application should not fail for a mechanical reason before anyone has seen your work.